<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LINQ on AdaTheDev Blog</title><link>https://www.adathedev.co.uk/tags/linq/</link><description>Recent content in LINQ on AdaTheDev Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><managingEditor>adathedev@gmail.com (Adrian Hills)</managingEditor><webMaster>adathedev@gmail.com (Adrian Hills)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.adathedev.co.uk/tags/linq/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Sorting a DataTable - LINQ performance</title><link>https://www.adathedev.co.uk/2010/02/sorting-datatable-linq-performance.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>adathedev@gmail.com (Adrian Hills)</author><guid>https://www.adathedev.co.uk/2010/02/sorting-datatable-linq-performance.html</guid><description>Whenever there are a number of ways to achieve the same goal, I&amp;rsquo;m always inquisitive as what the performance difference is between them. I&amp;rsquo;m a firm believer in thinking about scalability from the start - if you can make your best effort to prepare for scale, then you can save yourself time and effort further down the line. I like to try and avoid pain - it doesn&amp;rsquo;t agree with me.</description></item></channel></rss>